Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 11:54

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Dementia: Switching to MIND diet even later in life can lower risk - Medical News Today
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Apple Has a Huge Siri Problem That WWDC 2025 Probably Won’t Fix - Gizmodo
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Weekend Box Office: LILO & STITCH Stays on Top as BALLERINA Opens to $25M - boxofficepro.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Summer Game Fest releases hype trailer ahead of weekend of reveals - Eurogamer
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
'Mountainhead' Is Most-Watched HBO Original Film Since 'Bad Education' - Deadline